Medical Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only. Success rates are influenced by patient age, diagnosis, and treatment type. Do not use this data alone to choose a fertility clinic. Consult a board-certified reproductive endocrinologist.
CDC NASS 2022 · Bloomfield Hills, MI
Michigan Reproductive Medicine
Michigan Reproductive Medicine reported a 16.8% overall live-birth rate across 355 ART cycles in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan (CDC NASS 2022).
- 16.8%
- Overall live birth
- 35.1%
- Under 35
- 355
- Cycles · 2022
- 32.4%
- Single-embryo transfer
CDC NASS reporting card
NASS Reporting Card
#302 of 494 · cycle volumeMichigan Reproductive Medicine · 355 cycles · 16.8%
- RANK 355
- RANK 16.8%
- RANK #302
- RANK 32.4%
- RANK near Missouri Fertil…
- RANK 35.1%
Cycle-volume peer: Missouri Fertility (355 cycles · MO)
Source: CDC National ART Surveillance System. Discovery filter, not treatment advice. Read with age-band rates.
Michigan Reproductive Medicine in the ART cycle neighbourhood
The short answer
Michigan Reproductive Medicine's overall live-birth rate of 16.8% sits in the bottom quartile nationally among CDC-reporting clinics.
According to CDC National ART Surveillance System (NASS) 2022 filings, Michigan Reproductive Medicine published an overall live-birth rate of 16.8% (about the 5th percentile among 406 clinics with an overall rate) across 355 ART cycles in Bloomfield Hills, MI Corpus placement: ranks #302 of 494 clinics by reported ART cycle volume; ranks #384 of 406 clinics by reported overall live-birth rate Compare this clinic inside one CDC age band against peers; overall rates mix ages and case mix and are not a treatment recommendation.
Clinic verdict · CDC NASS 2022
Michigan Reproductive Medicine's overall live-birth rate of 16.8% sits in the bottom quartile nationally. Under-35 rate 35.1% is 13 points below the national 48%. Age remains the strongest driver; compare bands and state context below.
Clinic Confidence Score
Combines live-birth rate, reported cycle volume, and single-embryo-transfer share against the tracked clinic corpus, not a ranking of every fertility outcome or a substitute for consulting the clinic directly about your own case.
Where Michigan Reproductive Medicine sits among U.S. clinics
Overall CDC live-birth-rate band, 406 reporting clinics
This clinic
SET adherence vs national reference
Single-embryo-transfer rate is an ASRM-aligned safety metric, higher SET reduces multi-pregnancy and OHSS risk.
Share of transfers using one embryo only
Success Rates by Age Group
Using own eggs (fresh + frozen cycles). The CDC publishes a single combined bracket for patients over 40 in this table, so that is what is shown here.
Success rate = live births per ART cycle started. Source: CDC NASS 2022.
Cycle Breakdown
- Total Cycles
- 355
- Fresh Cycles
- 55
- Frozen Cycles
- 300
- Years Reporting
- 3
- Single Embryo Transfer %
- 32.4%
Services Available
- ✓ Donor Egg Available
- ✓ Gestational Carrier
Historical Success Rates
| Year | Total Cycles | Overall | Under 35 | 35–37 | 38–40 | Over 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 355 | 16.8% | 35.1% | 17.2% | 11.1% | N/A |
| 2021 | 297 | 31.5% | 42.2% | 35.3% | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 335 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Nationwide clinics with similar CDC profiles
Two cross-state peer sets for Michigan Reproductive Medicine. Same-state rate peers stay in the Read-with list below; these neighborhoods are nearest other-state clinics by published CDC totals (cycle floor ≥100).
Similar overall live-birth rate
Nearest clinics by overall live-birth rate (16.8% here), outside MI.
Similar ART cycle volume
Nearest clinics by reported ART cycles (355 here), excluding the rate-peer set.
Data source: CDC National ART Surveillance System (NASS). PlainFertility is not affiliated with the CDC or this clinic.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainFertility is rendered directly from CDC National ART Surveillance System source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on CDC National ART Surveillance System source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, every correction we have published, or report a data error on this page.