Los Angeles IVF Success Rates
27 CDC-reporting fertility clinics in this metro area.
Dense metro · heavy ART volume card
NASS Reporting Card
#2 of 45 metros · clinic inventory21,929 ART cycles · 27 clinics. Dense metro inventory — compare clinics inside one CDC age band before reading overall rates.
Los Angeles · 21,929 cycles · 28.2%
- ART 21,929
- ART 28.2%
- ART #2
- ART 27
- ART 43.6%
- ART near San Francisco …
Cycle-volume peer: San Francisco Bay Area (21,212 cycles)
Source: CDC NASS. Heavy combined ART volume (21,929 ART cycles · 27 clinics). Discovery filter, not treatment advice.
Los Angeles in the ART cycle neighbourhood
Los Angeles clinic roster (dense inventory)
| Clinic | City | Cycles | Under 35 | 35–37 | 38–40 | Over 40 | Overall | Donor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Center for Reproductive Health, Reproductive Fertility Center | West Hollywood | 1,217 | 39.6% | 22.3% | 16.8% | 2.9% | 20.2% | Yes |
| California Fertility Partners | Los Angeles | 1,527 | 43.6% | 28.6% | 18.6% | 5.3% | 20.4% | - |
| CARE Fertility | Glendale | 478 | 35.9% | 35.7% | 25.0% | 6.7% | 25.8% | - |
| Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine | Los Angeles | 308 | N/A | 20.0% | 20.0% | 8.7% | 16.9% | Yes |
| Center for Reproductive Health & Gynecology, (CRH&G) | Beverly Hills | 197 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 6.3% | 6.3% | Yes |
| Fertility and Surgical Associates of California | Thousand Oaks | 1,579 | 54.5% | 39.9% | 31.5% | 19.0% | 36.6% | Yes |
| HRC Fertility-Pasadena | Pasadena | 5,987 | 42.8% | 33.2% | 20.4% | 7.6% | 26.7% | Yes |
| Kindbody-Los Angeles | Santa Monica | 909 | 48.7% | 39.0% | 28.6% | 16.7% | 34.5% | Yes |
| Los Angeles Reproductive Center (LARC) | Encino | 676 | 47.7% | 36.2% | 16.7% | 13.0% | 28.1% | Yes |
| Pacific Fertility Center-Los Angeles | Los Angeles | 1,572 | 35.9% | 28.8% | 14.8% | 1.6% | 19.9% | Yes |
| Pacific Reproductive Center | Torrance | 292 | 60.7% | 42.1% | 32.7% | 25.0% | 43.6% | Yes |
| Reproductive Medicine Associates of Southern California | Los Angeles | 446 | 56.5% | 53.3% | 36.4% | 20.7% | 40.9% | - |
| Southern California Reproductive Center | Beverly Hills | 2,578 | 39.6% | 31.4% | 19.1% | 6.0% | 23.4% | Yes |
| The Center for Fertility and Gynecology, Vermesh Center for Fertility | Tarzana | 440 | 79.5% | 41.9% | N/A | 10.0% | 37.9% | Yes |
| Tree of Life Center for Fertility, California Fertility Clinics | Tarzana | 342 | 43.3% | 26.5% | 23.3% | 12.2% | 25.2% | Yes |
| UCLA Fertility Center | Santa Monica | 594 | 42.2% | 42.4% | 28.4% | 18.3% | 33.5% | Yes |
| University Fertility Center | Torrance | 262 | 28.6% | 39.4% | 33.3% | 2.9% | 25.4% | Yes |
| Western Fertility Institute | Encino | 734 | 50.6% | 49.0% | 25.8% | 20.7% | 41.7% | Yes |
| Publish no success rates in this CDC NASS extract (9 of 27 clinics here). These clinics appear in NASS and are listed in full; CDC published no rate for them, which is a reporting gap and not a statement about the care they provide. | ||||||||
| Beverly Hills Fertility | Los Angeles | 131 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| CMD Fertility | Los Angeles | 293 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| Incinta Fertility Center | Torrance | 119 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| Kathleen Kornafel, MD, PhD | Glendale | 34 | No rates published | - | ||||
| LA IVF Clinic | Los Angeles | 200 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| Santa Monica Fertility | Santa Monica | 324 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| The Fertility Institutes-Los Angeles, New York, Guadalajara | Encino | 98 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| Unity Fertility Center, LLC | Pasadena | 57 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
| USC Fertility | Pasadena | 535 | No rates published | Yes | ||||
Data: CDC NASS. Clinics listed are those whose city maps to this metro in the portal's CITY_TO_METRO table (the same map behind the metro clinic_count). The "Over 40" column is the CDC's single above-40 bracket in the cumulative own-eggs table; CDC does not split 41-42 from 43+ in this dataset.
Los Angeles live-birth rates by CDC age band
The overall figure above blends every age together, which is why comparing clinics inside one band is the comparison worth making. Across Los Angeles's reporting clinics the youngest and oldest bands differ by 35.6 percentage points – age is the strongest single driver in this dataset.
| Age band | Los Angeles clinic mean | National clinic mean | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 35 | 46.9%16 clinics publish this band | 48.0%399 clinics | -1.1 pts |
| 35 to 37 | 35.9%17 clinics publish this band | 35.3%358 clinics | +0.6 pts |
| 38 to 40 | 24.5%16 clinics publish this band | 22.5%355 clinics | +2.0 pts |
| Over 40 | 11.3%18 clinics publish this band | 8.8%303 clinics | +2.5 pts |
Each band is an unweighted mean of the clinics that publish it, which is why the clinic count differs by row – nationally 399 clinics report an under-35 rate and 303 report an over-40 one. Bands are not cycle-weighted, so a large clinic counts the same as a small one. A difference from the national mean reflects patient case mix as much as anything a clinic does, and is not a treatment recommendation: use it to choose which clinics to look at, then compare those clinics inside one band.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.